answer to TAG comment on Text in example of section 2.3 needs fixing

Dear Chris,

Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework:
Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004

After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will  
be considered as if you had accepted the comment.

Original comment (issue 1148 [1]):
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Mar/0012.html

As a response to your comment, the QA Working Group has accepted your  
comment and has decided to drop the specific example which was indeed  
not clear without more context.

[0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/
[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1148
[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#ref-define-ex


-- 
Karl Dubost
QA Working Group Chair
http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 15:52:22 UTC