- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 12:08:39 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Cc: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Dear Paul, Thanks for your comments on the Last Call version of the QA Framework: Specification Guidelines[0] - 22 November 2004 After two weeks from now (on May 18, 2005), the lack of answer will be considered as if you had accepted the comment. Thank you for your SpecGL review comments [1]. We appreciate your concerns expressed about "classes of products". Your issue regarding "classes of products" was entered as issue #1052 [2]. The QA Working Group accepted the comment, and we have revised the wording around Good Practice 01 [3], Good Practice 03 [4], and the Glossary [5] to clarify the definition and scope of "classes of products". [0] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0025 [2] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1052 [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#conformance- model-gp [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#conformance- claim-gp [5] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-qaframe-spec-20050428/#glossary -- Karl Dubost QA Working Group Chair http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:08:59 UTC