- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 16:08:18 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
On Tue, 3 May 2005, Karl Dubost wrote: > > Original comment (issue 1043 [1]) > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Jan/0008.html > > Thank you for your comment, which the QA Working Group has accepted. > We have included the example you recommended and it now reads [2] > > Good Practice 06: Provide examples, use cases, and graphics. > HTML 4.01 [HTML401]: The HTML 4.01 specification, dsigned in a very educative > way, has some very good examples. I think you may have misunderstood my comment. I was not suggesting that HTML4 be included (as indeed it already was); I was suggesting that although HTML4 does indeed have _some_ good examples, it also has a number of very poor examples, and might therefore not be the best specification to use to demonstrate how editors should write their documents. I am not happy with the current resolution, but do not consider it a serious problem and would accept it if the working group still disagrees. Cheers, -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:09:29 UTC