- From: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 09:12:57 -0600 (MDT)
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
On Thu, 6 May 2004, Lynne Rosenthal wrote: > I think there is danger in this. As Alex points out, for outsiders, > this doesn't work. I cannot think of any extension mechanism that makes required-to-understand extensions "work" for those who do not understand those extensions. Thus, I am not sure why negotiating extensions runtime is any more dangerous. > As for SpecGL - this isn't something to promote, but maybe something > to provide as an example of something not recommended. I hope that does not happen, but would be interested in reading "not recommended" rationale and adjusting the extension mechanism accordingly. Thanks, Alex.
Received on Friday, 7 May 2004 11:21:37 UTC