QA-related comments on charmod

• From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
• Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2004 18:02:27 -0600
• To: www-qa@w3.org
• Message-Id: <1079654547.8631.882.camel@dirk>

I just reviewed the new charmod Fundamentals spec. All of
my comments are basically QA-related.

Have you already spotted these issues? Do you think they're
worth fixing?

IRI section needs too much testing to go in Fundamentals Dan
Connolly (Thursday, 18 March)
  * appropriate mechanism exists... says who? Dan Connolly (Thursday, 18
    March)
  * define 'character' once and for all Dan Connolly (Thursday, 18
    March)
  * conformance to "software MUST NOT assume" measurable? Dan
    Connolly (Thursday, 18 March)

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-i18n-comments/2004Mar/thread.html


-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
see you at the WWW2004 in NY 17-22 May?

Received on Thursday, 18 March 2004 19:02:22 UTC