- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:59:54 +0200
- To: www-qa@w3.org
- Message-Id: <1081515593.17227.9.camel@stratustier>
[bcc to www-xml-xinclude-comments@w3.org FYI] Hello QA IG, While reviewing the Last Call version of XInclude [1], I thought that the markup conventions used in the text were good enough that I could extract the relevant conformance information using an XSLT; and indeed: http://www.w3.org/2004/04/xinclude-confreq.xsl allows to extract the said information: http://www.w3.org/2000/06/webdata/xslt?xslfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2004%2F04%2Fxinclude-confreq.xsl&xmlfile=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2003%2FWD-xinclude-20031110%2F&transform=Submit This is just food for thoughts on the topic of marking up conformance requirements in specification to allow easier reviewing of their contents and evaluation of their test suites; FWIW, I have at least 2 other recent examples of equivalent tools: """ I built a quick XSLT that allows to extract the conformance requirements from our GL docs, relying on our markup conventions; the XSLT is at: http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/02/extract-cr-from-gl.xsl """ Conformance requirements extracted from Ops and Spec Dominique Hazaël-Massieux Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Feb/0054.html and """ I've extracted from the document the list of constraints/principle/good practices (attached as text) - using a simplistic xslt also attached. """ Webarch conformance model (LC comments on the Architecture of the WWW) Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webarch-comments/2004Feb/0023.html Dom 1. http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-xinclude-20031110/ -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Friday, 9 April 2004 09:00:25 UTC