Re: lack of testability definition from Bjoern Hoehrmann on 2003-11-04 (www-qa@w3.org from November 2003)

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2003 18:53:24 +0100
To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
Cc: www-qa@w3.org
Message-ID: <3fa8e6da.3462368@smtp.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Alex Rousskov wrote:
>On Tue, 4 Nov 2003, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>
>> http://www.w3.org/TR/wcag2-tech-req/ has a nice definition.
>
>Note that the definition you quote renders pretty much all behavioral
>requirements such as "agent MUST do X" Machine Untestable. Since most
>of those requirements are also not possible to test via humans, the
>approach renders pretty much all behavioral specs as Machine and Human
>Untestable.

Sorry? Could you give some example requirements?

Received on Tuesday, 4 November 2003 12:56:23 UTC