- From: by way of the Lastcall Form <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2003 03:56 +0900
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Here is a last call comment from Jonathan Marsh (jmarsh@microsoft.com) on QA Framework : Specifications Guidelines (and Examples and Techniques) received by the LC form system. Submitted on behalf of: WS Description WG Comment type: Substantive The comment applies to: "7.3 If deprecation is used, define its relationships..." Comment title: Awkward deprecation requirements Comment: This checkpoint basically demands that if some feature has been deprecated, possibly because no one can agree on its proper definition, then it must be properly defined and its interactions fully characterized. It is likely that some things will be deprecated precisely because they cannot be well and unambiguously characterized; this checkpoint ensures that as long as these features are part of the main spec, it can conform at priority two, but as soon as the features are deprecated, it cannot. Proposed resolution : ]] -- This comment was submitted through the lastCall form system, designed by Martin Duerst and Adapted for the QAWG by Olivier Thereaux.
Received on Monday, 31 March 2003 13:56:55 UTC