- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 07:23:50 -0500
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, www-qa@w3.org
This is a great idea - it helps make the point that QA is important and having W3C do it is not abnormal. A few additions - OASIS: Conformance TC Specification: Conformance Requirements for Specifications http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/305/conformance_requirements-v1.pdf (this is a precursor to our SpecGL) ISO: ISO/IEC Directives Part 3, Rules for the structure and drafting of International Standards - equivalent to Pubs Rules and Manual of Style with a bit of SpecGL At 04:57 AM 12/1/2003, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >Greetings, > >I have made a quick survey of the QA activities/practices in other >(Internet) Standards bodies, and published the raw results at >http://www.w3.org/QA/2003/11/other-sdo-qa > >Of specific interest for the W3C QA activity: >- The testing and Test control notation, from ETSI >http://www.etsi.org/frameset/home.htm?/ptcc/ptccttcn3.htm >- Open GIS Consortium web-based test engine >http://cite.occamlab.com/test_engine/ >- the various guides on how to write quality specifications (IEEE, ISO, >ETSI, ITU) >- the various conformance testing programs (OASIS, OGC, VoiceXML, ...) > >If you have additions or suggestions, please let me know. > >Dom >-- >Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ >W3C/ERCIM >mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 1 December 2003 07:26:15 UTC