- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 14:11:58 -0600
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, Carmelo <carmelo@nist.gov>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
At 01:37 PM 5/31/02 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: >On Fri, 31 May 2002, Carmelo wrote: > > > I been monitoring the conversation regarding tagging of the > > specs for test case generation. We also need to consider the > > possibility (if not yet suggested) of doing this work as an > > "add-on" to the specs. [...] > >If my interpretation of your "add-on tagging" is correct, then an >addressing scheme I am arguing for can help: One can use >addresses/citations to identify/extract test assertions or whatever is >needed to auto-generate a test case. [...] Carmelo, I would be interested to hear details. What is added-on to the specs and how? Do you point from the test suite to test assertions in the spec? Do you point by section number, or by Xpointer-like address, or by element (id), or ...? Do you also extract the test assertion text (into the test suite), or just point? A brief summary along these lines would be interesting. Thanks, -Lofton.
Received on Friday, 31 May 2002 16:11:22 UTC