- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 12 Aug 2002 18:04:26 +0200
- To: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>, www-qa@w3.org
Le lun 12/08/2002 à 16:08, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit : > Another good thing would be to provide a table with the current W3C > Recommendations and the categories where they fit [not in the framework, > but as a companion document in /QA/ space for instance]. Here is an attempt of creating such a table: http://www.w3.org/QA/2002/08/rec_categories I'm not sure if it will prove useful in better shaping the categories, but at least it can help show what we mean behind them. David, could you check that I indeed got the idea that where behind your classification? There a few spec that I'm unsure what category fit them best (they are backed in green on the said page). I'm happy to take any suggestions on them. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/INRIA mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 12:04:30 UTC