- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 12 Aug 2002 16:08:05 +0200
- To: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-qa@w3.org
I think it would be worth clarifying the following points on the list of categories for specification [1]: - the categorization mechanism is not described: it would be good to say from where this categorization comes. It's probably as simple as "what the specification describes" - the 4th bullet "processors" doesn't answer the same question as the other bullets: XSLT doesn't specify a "processor", but a processing language. I would say too that the 2nd bullet would be clearer with "content/data formatting" Another good thing would be to provide a table with the current W3C Recommendations and the categories where they fit [not in the framework, but as a companion document in /QA/ space for instance]. Dom 1. http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2002/08/qaframe-spec-0804.html#document-categories -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/INRIA mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 10:08:07 UTC