Re: Usage of the word "specification" in the spec GL

• From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
• Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 09:25:29 -0600
• To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
• Cc: www-qa@w3.org
• Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020812092055.04156250@rockynet.com>

At 03:46 PM 8/12/02 +0200, you wrote:
>Le sam 10/08/2002 à 19:54, Lofton Henderson a écrit :
> > >[...]
> >
> > For your second dash-item, how about "specification's functionality" in
> > place of the appropriate occurrences of "specification"?
>
>Err... Do you mean technology's functionality?

I was trying to say "the functionality defined by the specification", and 
was using functionality with the same meaning and sense (I think) as your 
"technology".


> >  Would something
> > that simple suffice?
>
>My suggestions would be to replace "specification" with "technology" in
>the 3 concerned GL.

I don't mind using "technology", and will make the suggested clarification, 
unless someone objects.

-Lofton.

Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 11:25:30 UTC