- From: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2002 10:40:18 -0400
- To: www-qa@w3.org
Dominique writes: >- I wonder if the GL about levels brings anything useful, since levels >don't really exert any influence on conformance or implementation. It was a surprise to read that! I think the influence of levels is clear when you consider the verbiage constraints in Checkpoint 11.2, at least after the word "levels" in GL 11 is replaced. 11.2 would, in my interpretation, require that a spec that uses levels (in the GL 7 sense), to prescribe level-aware verbiage for conformance claims. Example: All claims of conformance to this spec should state the level of implementation, [levels enumerated here], which is claimed. Thus, one implementation could claim to fully implement the Xblah spec at Level 2, while another implementation claims conformance to Xblah Level 3. .................David Marston
Received on Monday, 12 August 2002 10:41:16 UTC