- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 09 Aug 2002 18:12:01 +0200
- To: Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>
- Cc: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, Art.Barstow@nokia.com, www-qa@w3.org
Le ven 09/08/2002 à 18:04, Alex Rousskov a écrit : > If QA WG doesn't encourage something, it would be a good policy to > explain why. So far, I have not seen any objective reasons why one > word should be preferred to another. Hmm... What about : Mark Skall > Let's not proliferate additional terms. We should encourage > the use of "conformance". That's the word we use. and Lynne Rosenthal > compliance has been used more with a marketing > connotation Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/INRIA mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Friday, 9 August 2002 12:12:07 UTC