- From: Daniel Dardailler <danield@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:35:37 +0200
- To: "Andrew Thackrah" <andrew@opengroup.org>
- cc: www-qa@w3.org
I think the process you outline makes sense. Auditing is already something we're doing for Accessibility, I18N, and soon Device Independance. > How would a QA activity interact with other activities? > > Would the QA members work in a purely advisory role to other groups > or would the activity have some authority to impose certain standards? > > If advisory, would QA input only come by invitation of the activity, or > would each activity have QA members involved/assigned to steer the work on > QA issues? > > An activity could adopt a certain QA policy (such as itemised by David > Marston) > and then request the QA group to audit their work. > > Acceptance criteria could be set for certain activities with QA acting as > adjudicators - or advisors to a higher authority. > > > Andrew Thackrah
Received on Wednesday, 25 April 2001 06:35:37 UTC