- From: Mark W. Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
- Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 11:48:04 -0400
- To: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <60DE4C815920CA41AF6CC5CFDA9CC849010F160B@WSXG03.campus.nist.gov>
I had a very good conversation with Paul and I think we came to an understanding. I first explained to Paul the history of having different conformance sections for different entities that pertain to the same standard. I went all the way back to programming language standards of the 70s and 80s that talked about implementation conformance and programmer conformance and the need to distinguish between the two types of conformance. As further examples, I explained the need to distinguish among entities like producers of content, producers of tools that develop content (generators, authoring tools), and producers of tools that do something with the content (interpreters, user agents) with respect to how they conform. Paul was onboard with the concept and the need to identify classes of products and describe how they conform. The problem stemmed from Paul not be able to visualize how the COP concept applied to XML, since its applicability was so broad. I think the breakthrough occurred when I asked him to think about writing the XML conformance clause. I explained that in writing conformance requirements the writer is implicitly identifying who the conformance requirements are written for. Whoever is implicitly being thought about is the class of product. Paul seemed to resonate with that approach. He also had thought that a class of product needed to be a commercial product (the name class of product may be misleading). When I explained that a COP could be a document (and that in fact the COP for SpecGL was indeed a document) that seemed to ease his mind. Hopefully, after this conversation his misgivings/objections about COP were eliminated. Mark **************************************************************** Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970 Voice: 301-975-3262 Fax: 301-590-9174 Email: skall@nist.gov ****************************************************************
Received on Thursday, 16 June 2005 15:48:08 UTC