- From: Patrick Curran <Patrick.Curran@Sun.COM>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 13:37:33 -0700
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
This seems like a no-brainer. It can't hurt, and may help to add a version number... Karl Dubost wrote: > > > Le 05-07-29 à 13:09, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > >> The cover page of PR SpecGL 1.0, >> http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ , >> is interesting in that it doesn't contain a version number. >> >> While we don't anticipate a 1.1 or 2.0 soon, and as I recall >> pubrules doesn't require it (but suggests it), it seems pretty >> common amongst W3C Recommendations. >> >> Should Rec SpecGL have a major version number? > > > That was a question I raised at a meeting (I can't find the > discussion). We never reached consensus on that one. >
Received on Friday, 29 July 2005 20:39:22 UTC