- From: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Jul 2005 16:23:48 -0400
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Le 05-07-29 à 13:09, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > The cover page of PR SpecGL 1.0, > http://www.w3.org/TR/qaframe-spec/ , > is interesting in that it doesn't contain a version number. > > While we don't anticipate a 1.1 or 2.0 soon, and as I recall > pubrules doesn't require it (but suggests it), it seems pretty > common amongst W3C Recommendations. > > Should Rec SpecGL have a major version number? That was a question I raised at a meeting (I can't find the discussion). We never reached consensus on that one. -- Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ W3C Conformance Manager *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
Received on Friday, 29 July 2005 20:23:51 UTC