- From: Kennedy, Richard T <richard.t.kennedy@boeing.com>
- Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:03:51 +0000
- To: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
QA Working Group Teleconference Wednesday, 14-February-2004 -- Scribe: (RK) Richard Kennedy (Boeing) Attendees: (TB) Tim Boland (NIST) (KD) Karl Dubost (W3C, Chair) (DH) Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (W3C) (LH) Lofton Henderson (CGMO) (RK) Richard Kennedy (Boeing) (LR) Lynne Rosenthal (NIST) Guests: (DM) David Marston (IBM) Regrets: (DD) Dimitris Dimitriadis (Ontologicon) Absent: (PC) Patrick Curran (Sun Microsystems) (MS) Mark Skall (NIST) Summary of New Action Items: AI-20050214-1 KD Send revised text for #1052 to QA group, 2005-02-15 AI-20050214-2 DH Send revised text for #1050 to QA group, 2005-02-21 AI-20050214-3 KD Review SpecGL actions, 2005-02-21 AI-20050214-4 KD Send revised text for #1044 to QA group, 2005-02-21 AI-20050214-5 DH Send revised text for #1060 to QA group, 2005-02-21 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0024.html Previous Telcon Minutes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0021.html Minutes: 1.) Roll call at 11 am EDT [See Attendees, Regrets, & Absent above.] 2.) Routine business * Discussion, about xml:id, versioning and extension. The SpecGL has been reviewed by the XML Schema WG. People are awakening to the idea of what is the real meaning of name space. This item will be brought up at the Technical Plenary in Boston. 3.) SpecGL issues DH's analysis is at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Jan/0074 #1087 Address Accessibility http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1087 LR has proposed wording for the Scope of QA SpecGL at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0020 There being no objections, it was adopted without dissention. This item is now resolved. #1047 Addition to error mechanism KD and DH wrote something about it. See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0007 & http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0019 As DH's draft was considered clearer, it was adopted without dissention. This item is now resolved. #1045 Avoiding device-dependent profiles http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1045 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Feb/0023 Ongoing: KD will continue trying to get more information about from Ian Hickson. #1041 Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS) http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1041 Ongoing: LH will modify the wording. Due date is February 21. #1052 "Classes of product" unclear and dangerous http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1052 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0015 KD will send the revised text from RK to the QA WG mailing list by February 15 [AI-20050214-1]. #1048 Additions to "write tests" http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1048 KD wrote something to clarify http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0008 There being no objections to his revisions, this item is now resolved. #1049 Formal vs prose language normatively http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1049 (Duplicate of #1091) Ongoing: KD to write a good practice about it. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0009 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0012 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0016 Ongoing: KD is still rewriting GP 5.E about formal languages. The due date is February 16. #1050 Modesty requirement http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1050 KD disagrees with this bug. The group consensus is the text is OK as currently written. DH will draft a formal reply [AI-20050214-2] and send it to the QA WG list. Due date is February 21. KD will review the SpecGL [AI-20050214-3]. Due date February 21. #1044 Consistent style for conformance requirements http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1044 KD will rewrite the text [AI-20050214-4] and send it to the QA WG list. Due date is February 21. #1060 Umbrella specifications http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1060 KD will move the current text into ViS, review the new proposed text and send it to the QA WG list [AI-20050214-5]. Due date is February 21. 4. Next meeting The next meeting is February 21. Employees of the US Federal Government will not be attending due to the President's Day Holiday.
Received on Wednesday, 23 February 2005 00:02:27 UTC