- From: Kennedy, Richard T <richard.t.kennedy@boeing.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:47:11 +0000
- To: <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
QA Working Group Teleconference
Wednesday, 14-February-2004
--
Scribe: (RK) Richard Kennedy (Boeing)
Attendees:
(TB) Tim Boland (NIST)
(KD) Karl Dubost (W3C, Chair)
(DH) Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (W3C)
(LH) Lofton Henderson (CGMO)
(RK) Richard Kennedy (Boeing)
(LR) Lynne Rosenthal (NIST)
Regrets:
(DD) Dimitris Dimitriadis (Ontologicon)
Absent:
(PC) Patrick Curran (Sun Microsystems)
(MS) Mark Skall (NIST)
Summary of New Action Items:
AI-20050214-1 KD Send revised text for #1052 to QA group, 2005-02-15
AI-20050214-2 DH Send revised text for #1050 to QA group, 2005-02-21
AI-20050214-3 KD Review SpecGL actions, 2005-02-21
AI-20050214-4 KD Send revised text for #1044 to QA group, 2005-02-21
AI-20050214-5 KD Send revised text for #1060 to QA group, 2005-02-21
Agenda:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0024.html
Previous Telcon Minutes:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0021.html
Minutes:
1.) Roll call at 11am EDT [See Attendees, Regrets, & Absent above.]
2.) Routine business
* Discussion, about xml:id, versioning and extension.
The SpecGL has been reviewed by the XML Schema WG. People are awakening
to the idea of what is the real meaning of name space. ________ will
bring this item up at the Technical Plenary in Boston.
3.) SpecGL issues
DH's analysis is at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Jan/0074
#1087 Address Accessibility
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1087
LR has proposed wording for the Scope of QA SpecGL at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0020
There being no objections, it was adopted without dissention.
This item is now resolved.
#1047 Addition to error mechanism
KD and DH wrote something about it. See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0007 &
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0019
As DH's draft was considered clearer, it was adopted without
dissention.
This item is now resolved.
#1045 Avoiding device-dependent profiles
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1045
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2005Feb/0023
Ongoing: KD will continue trying to get more information
about from Ian Hickson.
#1041 Conformance is not a yes/no proposition (wrt filling an ICS)
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1041
Ongoing: LH will modify the wording. Due date is February 21.
#1052 "Classes of product" unclear and dangerous
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1052
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0015
KD will send the revised text from RK to the QA WG mailing list by
February 15 [AI-20050214-1].
#1048 Additions to "write tests"
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1048
KD wrote something to clarify
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0008
There being no objections to his revisions, this item is now
resolved.
#1049 Formal vs prose language normatively
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1049 (Duplicate of
#1091)
Ongoing: KD to write a good practice about it.
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0009
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0012
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2005Feb/0016
Ongoing: KD is still rewriting GP 5.E about formal languages. The
due
date is February 16.
#1050 Modesty requirement
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1050
KD disagrees with this bug. The group consensus is the text is OK
as
currently written. DH will draft a formal reply [AI-20050214-2]
and send
it to the QA WG list. Due date is February 21. KD will review the
SpecGL
[AI-20050214-3]. Due date February 21.
#1044 Consistent style for conformance requirements
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1044
KD will rewrite the text [AI-20050214-4] and send
it to the QA WG list. Due date is February 21.
#1060 Umbrella specifications
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=1060
KD will draft some new language on defining requirements for
multi-
specification documents [AI-20050214-5] and send it to the QA WG
list.
Due date is February 21.
4. Next meeting
The next meeting is February 21. Employees of the US Federal
Government will
not be attending due to the President's Day Holiday.
Received on Tuesday, 15 February 2005 22:47:03 UTC