- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2005 07:54:01 -0600
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>,"'www-qa-wg@w3.org'" <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
At 04:50 PM 8/18/2005 -0400, Karl Dubost wrote: >[...] >6.) Conformance Clause Template [4] > Lead: Karl Dubost > > - Status and Progress[. >[...] >[4] http://w3c.test.site/QA/WG/2004/08/SpecGL-template-text.html I have just noticed that this review version of the restyled CC template is in fact the one that is linked from REC SpecGL. I think that is a mistake. We should finish sorting out the issues and problems before we link it from REC SpecGL. Could we put the previous version back in place at that URI while we sort out the new version? (Or rather ... maybe the version which I delivered to Karl prior to Dublin, for the restyling work -- that pre-Dublin version had improved alignment with REC SpecGL and had back links to the corresponding REC SpecGL sections.) More. Aside from the problem of styling in IE, I think we ought to review the individual sections. For example (looking at my local desktop copy of the previous template), I think there are some changes to Step 3 that are not purely stylistic. But I haven't had time for a careful side-by-side review of the corresponding sections yet. Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 22 August 2005 13:54:12 UTC