Telcon minutes (DRAFT) 20041117

All,

For your review, important since I may have missed out on the first 
discussion items.

---

QA Working Group Teleconference
Wednesday, 17-Nov-2004
--
Scribe: Dimitris Dimitriadis

Attendees:
(PC) Patrick Curran (Sun Microsystems)
(DD) Dimitris Dimitriadis (Ontologicon)
(KD) Karl Dubost (W3C, WG chair)
(DH) Dominique Hazaƫl-Massieux (W3C)
(LH) Lofton Henderson (CGMO)
(RK) Richard Kennedy (Boeing)
(LR) Lynne Rosenthal (NIST - IG co-chair)
(MS) Mark Skall (NIST)
(TB) Tim Bolland (NIST)

(DM) David Marston (IBM)


Summary of New Action Items:
AI-20041117-1 Karl Write prose for the examples with regard to Web 
Ontologies 20041117
AI-20041117-2 Lofton Send a third bullet for 2.3.b 20041117

Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Nov/0053.html

Minutes:

Agenda
  =====

  Scribe: Richard, Dimitris, Lofton
  Chair: Karl

  1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership

  2.) routine business
    - Teleconf schedule: Conflict for Richard T. Kennedy
Wednesday 11 AM - noon
Weekly or bi-weekly?
(kd) suggestion to start out with every other week, possibly change 
later.
(dh) suggest to meet weekly.
resolution: meeting weekly

  3.) QA Framework Specifications publication
	Lead: Karl

[EdNote: Please sanity check this section, as it was outside the scope 
of the posted agenda]

(lh) should date be 22 nov?
(dh) yes, QAH is not published at last call, but as a note. Notes don't 
have last call
(lh) you recommend not to create distraction by calling QAH last call?
(dh) yes
(TB) changes since last call supposed to not be substantial
(lh) yes
(kd) QAH has been decided to be a note

(lh) accepts the resolution on issue number 7

(kd) proposal to remove the two examples, considering that the 
documents are informative, not normative. (5 good practice a)

(kd) 5 good practices: write some sample code: do you agree to remove 
these things and add them later on if we find use cases, or not?

AI, today, karl to write prose for the examples wrt. web ontologies (5 
good practices)

(kd) added some legends to the graphics, put a legend to make it 
clearer, is it ok?

(minuter got lost in the diagram discussion, raised by david in 
relation to dom's diagram???)
(kd) the meaning of the diagram is to show one possible way to organize 
the technology; still don't see the objection
(dm) the diagram show a number of modules, defined by the WG. there's a 
conformance notion for each module. you had a sentence in the legends 
saying that module "e" was not about conformance.
(dh) indeed a bit confusing
(kd) just remove this part of the sentence?
(dm) accepts "module e is an optional module of the technology"
(dh) the idea is just to illustrate some, not all, possible cases
(kd) agreement to remove the ssecond part of the sentence, about module 
e

(dm) issue with 2.3 good practices example
(kd) prose a bit modified this morning
(dm) it's clearer what you mean

(kd) do we keep the examples? yes, we can still review and find better 
examples.

AI, lofton to send a third bullet for 2.3.b, the example to be kept

	* Need an official agreement of the QA WG to publish
		- QA Handbook
		- QA Specification Guidelines
	* SpecGL: Table of Contents of Specifications Guidelines: who?
(kd) done

	* SpecGL: ICS of Specification Guidelines: who?
(kd) done

	* SpecGL: Diff version of SpecGL: who?
(kd) done

	* SpecGL: Conformance Template: new version?
(kd) do not have a new version, do we need to update the conformance 
template?
(lh) qa wg space file needs updating, have an action item to do it, 
will be able to do it in two weeks (200411), before that the 
conformance template will be provided with a note saying it will be 
updated

(kd) anyone opposed to publish SpecGL as last call? No-one object, WG 
agrees to publish SpecGL as Last Call document.
(dh) want to make sure people understand the commitment of publishing 
this as a last call document
(kd) Thanks go to Lynne, Dom and all others for all work done with 
SpecGL

	* QAH: QA Handbook Last minute issues/questions?
(lh) nothing substantive and outstanding, mainly editorial work left to 
do


  3.) QA Other documents update
	Lead: Karl

	* Test Document: Patrick update?
(kd) any update?
(pc) will work on it next week
(dd) please include me in the loop
(rk) can report on test related actions in the groups I participate

	* QAF Primer: Need things to do? Lofton/Dom
		Karl thinks the CSS needs to be polished
(dh) I've made an update of the document, no specific issues to raise, 
the document could use more attention


	* Variability in Specification: Dom Update?
(dh) no progress in this document, won't have time to work until mid 
december or beginning of january


(kd) Congratulations to the WG for publishing SpecGL, many thanks.

  4.) Adjourn

  5.) Overflow (12-12:30): available.

Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2004 17:06:14 UTC