Re: SpecGL todos (was: IMPORTANT Wednesday (17 November) QA WG telecon Agenda) from Lofton Henderson on 2004-11-16 (www-qa-wg@w3.org from November 2004)

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 16:11:45 -0700
To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20041116160517.022a8908@localhost>

At 03:11 PM 11/16/2004 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote:
>Le mar 16/11/2004 à 14:27, Karl Dubost a écrit :
> >   3.) QA Framework Specifications publication
> >       * Need an official agreement of the QA WG to publish
> >               - QA Handbook
> >               - QA Specification Guidelines
>
>(the official agreement is particularly important for SpecGL, since Last
>Call Document means that the Working Group as a whole agrees that there
>is no issue left in the document, said otherwise, Working Group
>participants lose their rights to raise formal objections)

Is this really true!?  What do you mean by "formal objections"?  How does 
that relate to technical issues?

In a recent previous message, Karl said "[...if not satisfied...] it up 
after LC".

-Lofton.

Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 23:11:57 UTC