- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 17:08:49 +0100
- To: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 16:08:51 UTC
Le mar 16/11/2004 à 16:52, Karl Dubost a écrit : > QA WG, > > Look at the title of 4.2C and tell me if you think it's wrong. It does look wrong, indeed. I'm not sure why the "any limitations or constraints" has been deleted, rather than simply completed by "on optional features". > 4.2 Good Practice A: Make sure there is a need for the optional feature > 4.2 Good Practice B: Clearly identify optional feature > 4.2 Good Practice C: Indicate optional feature > (previous was: Indicate any limitations or constraints) Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 16:08:51 UTC