- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:07:31 -0500
- To: "Karl Dubost" <karl@w3.org>, <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 16:07:14 UTC
both GP B and C seem to have the wrong titles and don't reflect the original meaning. B used to be: Indicate any limitations or constraints C used to be: address the impact of the option suggest: B: indicate limitations or constrains on the optional feature C: address the implication of the optional feature --lynne At 10:52 AM 11/16/2004, Karl Dubost wrote: >QA WG, > >Look at the title of 4.2C and tell me if you think it's wrong. > >4.2 Good Practice A: Make sure there is a need for the optional feature >4.2 Good Practice B: Clearly identify optional feature >4.2 Good Practice C: Indicate optional feature > (previous was: Indicate any limitations or constraints) > >-- >Karl Dubost - <http://www.w3.org/People/karl/>http://www.w3.org/People/karl/ >W3C Conformance Manager >*** Be Strict To Be Cool *** > > >
Received on Tuesday, 16 November 2004 16:07:14 UTC