Re: SpecGL todos (was: IMPORTANT Wednesday (17 November) QA WG telecon Agenda)

Le mar 16/11/2004 à 15:34, Karl Dubost a écrit :
> Le 16 nov. 2004, à 09:11, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux a écrit :
> >> 	* SpecGL: Table of Contents of Specifications Guidelines: who?
> >
> > I have an XSLT that does the right thing.
> 
> cool :)
> Be careful that some del/ins has to be removed first. But I would be 
> happy to have the new TOC.

(I also have the XSLT that removes del/ins, FWIW)

> >> 	* SpecGL: ICS of Specification Guidelines: who?
> >
> > How was produced the current ICS? Was it using XSLT? If so, I suppose
> > it's "only" a matter to re-run it; otherwise, I'm willing to make the
> > XSLT needed.
> 
> Obscure series of grep  ;)

OK, so I wrote a proper XSLT:
http://www.w3.org/QA/Group/Editor/newspecgl-ics.xsl

> >> 	* SpecGL: Diff version of SpecGL: who?
> >
> > The editor version of SpecGL is just that, right?
> 
> More or less. Sometimes there are small discrepancies. ins and del are 
> not necessary always effective with regards to list for example. And I 
> may have forgotten some.
> And it's definitely not the exact difference between

I don't think the diff needs to be exactly the difference between 2 the
document versions, as long as it highlights the main changes.

> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20040830/
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041118/ (potential)
> 
> But once the document is ready to publish we can use
> 	http://theinternetco.net/projects/ruby/xhtmldiff

Provided that it gives better results; but if you're willing to go that
way, I'm happy to let you deal with this :)

Dom
-- 
Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/
W3C/ERCIM
mailto:dom@w3.org