- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:58:13 +0100
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 14:58:16 UTC
Le jeu 04/11/2004 à 15:49, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > That may be the place to find the answer. But the question is definitely > relevant here, to our work. Absolutely; as a matter of fact, I realized it more at the end of my mail than at the beginning :) Nevertheless, there may be nothing to worry about (e.g. if site-policy says that's ok when said in the spec), so I think getting first an answer there would be better. > We are investing a lot of energy into the > topics areound "subdividing the specification". Our ViS (supporting > SpecGL) even recommends rules for profiles to support "derived profiles", > e.g., by external groups. > > I will ask the question. But I think QAWG should be prepared to take a > position. Agreed; thanks for raising this. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 14:58:16 UTC