- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2004 07:49:40 -0700
- To: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 09:05 AM 11/4/2004 +0100, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: >Le jeu 04/11/2004 à 00:18, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > > Is it legal for an individual or group to write a profile of a Rec which > > contains the Document License [1]? That license says: > >FWIW, the right mailing list to ask this question is site-policy@w3.org >(non publicly archived). That may be the place to find the answer. But the question is definitely relevant here, to our work. We are investing a lot of energy into the topics areound "subdividing the specification". Our ViS (supporting SpecGL) even recommends rules for profiles to support "derived profiles", e.g., by external groups. I will ask the question. But I think QAWG should be prepared to take a position. -Lofton.
Received on Thursday, 4 November 2004 14:50:05 UTC