Re: [SpecGL Draft] E. Principle: Do Quality Control during the specification development

At 11:27 AM 7/2/2004 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>Le jeu 01/07/2004 ŗ 22:38, Karl Dubost a ťcrit :
>[...]
> >       3. If you really need to put an incomplete section, make it clear 
> that
> >               3.a It's incomplete
> >               3.b comments are not encouraged on this particular section.
>
>3b is too much I think; an incomplete section might actually need more
>comments than other sections in a working draft.

As both circumstances can be envisioned, how about expressing in 3b, "be 
clear about comment expectations -- are comments and contributions desired, 
or should readers ignore the section for now?"

-Lofton.

Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 08:55:26 UTC