W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > July 2004

Re: [SpecGL Draft] E. Principle: Do Quality Control during the specification development

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 06:52:55 -0600
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20040702064845.0335a180@localhost>
To: Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux <dom@w3.org>, Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 11:27 AM 7/2/2004 +0200, Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux wrote:
>Le jeu 01/07/2004 ŗ 22:38, Karl Dubost a ťcrit :
>[...]
> >       3. If you really need to put an incomplete section, make it clear 
> that
> >               3.a It's incomplete
> >               3.b comments are not encouraged on this particular section.
>
>3b is too much I think; an incomplete section might actually need more
>comments than other sections in a working draft.

As both circumstances can be envisioned, how about expressing in 3b, "be 
clear about comment expectations -- are comments and contributions desired, 
or should readers ignore the section for now?"

-Lofton.
Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 08:55:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:36 UTC