- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 15:31:30 -0700
- To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Mark, Excellent minutes. A couple of minor clarifications (embedded)... At 02:33 PM 1/5/04 -0500, Mark Skall wrote: >[...] > >The following link is Sandro's discretion of ontology test results: >www.w3.org/2002/03owlt/resultsOntology That should be "description", not "discretion". >[...] >LH Test cases do not constitute a conforming test suite for OWL and >interoperability is in terms of test cases. Aren't there holes (no test >cases for normative content in OWL)? Change "conforming" to "conformance". (Interestingly, this is potentially more significant than a simple typo. Because of the normative Rec-track "OWL Test Cases" specification, which contains some rules for "test case types", etc, one could argue that OWL defines the notion of conforming test cases and conforming test suites. But in the above quote I do mean "conformance".) -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 5 January 2004 17:29:48 UTC