- From: by way of Lofton Henderson <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:56:52 -0700
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
[QAWG -- 1 of 2 messages from Jeremy, replying to me, about processing of his issues...] >We have not initially applied a 3x multiplier to break them out as 23 >comments, however. Rather, we have broken them out as 8 comments whose >scope we understand encompasses any and all applicable documents -- esp. >Ops, Spec, and Test. This actually facilitates treating them uniformly, >in my view. That's fine - I agree it makes more sense to process them as 8 comments not 23. >That said, there is discussion and proposals for a comprehensive, >whole-family approach to significant changes to the QAF documents. The >acceptance and implementation of some proposed ideas about QAF -- e.g., >Intro+Ops becomes a user-friendly "QA Handbook" -- might make some of the >comments moot about some of the components. But I think that is also >easily handled within the 8 vs. 23 approach. >Would you have any problem with us handling your critical issues this way? No problem at all - I merely wanted to be clear that when advancing any of those three documents that these comments applied. Jeremy
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2004 11:53:47 UTC