- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2004 20:38:26 -0700
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG, Monday Feb 23 telecon is about CR issues, in preparation for f2f. On Monday we should at least: ** get owners for more of the issues (=> initial proposals before f2f); ** preview some proposals about QAF Future. The current (still preliminary) CR issues list is: [1] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/02/cr-issues More work is still needed for cross-referencing and grouping, but all of the big conceptual issues and some of the detailed ones about specific GL documents are here. Contents: ** All WebOnt issues, major and minor. ** JC's emailed procedural protests. ** All of JC's critical-8 issues, complete w/ sub-issues, from his extensive document [2] ** Bjoern H's missed 5 issues from September ** 3 issues from recent QAWG TA thread. ** issues from LH SpecGL analysis. It does not have (and ought to have): SpecGL issues generated during the 3-4 telecons about SpecGL TAs. (Anyone volunteer to give me brief statements of those?). We have also decided to queue the few dozen GL-specific detailed issues from JC (e.g., ch.4, 5, 7, ...) [2] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/02/JC-CR-comments . Following are the major QAF/QAWG conceptual issues whose resolution will probably shape and impact how we deal with many of the detailed issues: CR-1 through CR-6: WebOnt (Jim Hendler) QAF conceptual issues. CR-32, CR-35 through CR-41: Jeremy Carroll (JC) "critical" issues -- the subset for which he expects formal reply. CR-32, CR-33, CR-34: emailed procedural protests (issues) from JC. QA Chairs have done some preliminary discussions, considering these comments, QAWG status and available resources (people), etc. I have summarized these discussions and my understanding of QA Chairs consensus for dealing with some of the major conceptual issues. Consider this preliminary, as I have not received QA Chairs endorsement that I have got it right: [3] http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/02/QAFproposal In the issues list [1], we have assigned this ownership so far: LH: CR-1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 35, 37, 39, 40 DH: CR-32, 33, 34 Owners wanted: CR-2, 38. (Plus CR-36, 41 -- but see below.) Actually, owners are wanted for all of 'em that aren't listed here. Volunteers welcome, otherwise we might divide and assign. I propose that GL editors by default take initial ownership of theirs: LH for Intro, LH for Ops, LR and/or DH for Spec (PC/DD for Test, if there are any new ones.) DH suggests recasting: CR-36, 38. (LH doesn't understand -- discuss/clarify on Monday.) Regards, -Lofton.
Received on Sunday, 22 February 2004 22:39:30 UTC