- From: olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 21:51:20 +0900
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 07:51:27 UTC
On Feb 19, 2004, at 10:06, Lofton Henderson wrote: > These are only my own interpretations Thanks! These are great answers, clarifies my doubts perfectly. > no QAWG standing (would QAWG consensus answers be a good idea?). This is an interesting question. On one hand, we want to give answers without showing doubts, on the other hand, if interpretations differ, the WG should take the opportunity to discuss and reach consensus. I can wait until monday to give the answers I have, leaving the group time to disagree if needed. thanks -- olivier
Received on Thursday, 19 February 2004 07:51:27 UTC