- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2004 17:49:45 -0700
- To: 'www-qa-wg@w3.org' <www-qa-wg@w3.org>
QA Working Group Teleconference Wednesday, 01-December-2004 -- Scribe: Lofton Henderson Attendees: (TB) Tim Boland (NIST) (KD) Karl Dubost (W3C, Chair) (LH) Lofton Henderson (CGMO) (LR) Lynne Rosenthal (NIST) (MS) Mark Skall (NIST) (DM) David Marston (IBM) -- guest Regrets: (PC) Patrick Curran (Sun Microsystems) regrets (DD) Dimitris Dimitriadis (Ontologicon) regrets (DH) Dominique Hazaël-Massieux (W3C) regrets Absent: (RK) Richard Kennedy (Boeing) absent Summary of New Action Items: AI-20041201-1: Karl -- Restore the minutes template to be the correct format -- 20041208 AI-20041201-2: Karl -- find W3C documents about different WG roles (Chair, team contact, spec editor, test manager, etc) -- 20041208 Agenda: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Nov/0096.html Previous Telcon Minutes: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Dec/0003.html Minutes: At 12:16 PM 11/29/2004 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote: > Agenda > ===== > Scribe: Lofton > Chair: Karl > >1.) roll call 11am EDT, membership done. >2.) routine business > * News in the field. SpecGL adoption KD: HTML working group will review SpecGL. >3.) Other Spec Reviews against SpecGL > Lead: Karl > > We need to find implementation proof of SpecGL [1] WD LC. Then a > list of assignments will be presented to the QA WG to make reviews of > others specifications. See Karl's email of this morning, http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2004Dec/0002.html KD: main goal of reviews is to ensure that our 9 requirements of SpecGL are met. Ruby: Lynne yeah I'll try. SVG 1.1: Lofton okay for January 1st. CC/PP: Richard (tbd) MathML: Dom (tbd) SMIL: Patrick (tbd) CSS 2.0: Tim. Question do you want 2.0 or 2.1? The differences are more than minor. 2.1 is what is being implemented. KD: if CSS 2.1 is better implementation proof for SpecGL, do that. TB: there is also some implementation of CSS3.0 modules. KD: explains his problems with ill-defined conformance landscape of 3.0 (no umbrella spec). Tim -- accepts to do CSS 2.1. XML 1.0: Dimitris (tbd) WCAG 1.0: Olivier (tbd) XSLT 1.0: Dave accepts. Xinclude: Mark accepts. DM: by when do we want to have 2 implementations of each feature? KD: ... (scribe missed the answer) ... DM: deprecation problematic for 1.0 features. KD: don't wait till the end, send reviews to him early. ...(lotsa discussion missed)... MS: accepts Xinclude. MS: what are we supposed to do in these reviews? KD: fill in the SpecGL ICS. MS: identifies problem with scoring specs against SpecGL, when the specs were written before SpecGL. LR: SpecGL says it is summarizing current practice of W3C. KD: the QA team (KD, DHM, OT) are trying to sign up specific groups to implement SpecGL principles. (those groups are: CSS, WS??, DI) >4.) Test Document > Lead: Patrick Curran > Update on the document? Missing Patrick, we skipped this item. >5.) Test Leader/QA Manager Profile > Lead: Karl > > If we had to write a "job announcement" for a Test Leader in a > WG. What would be the announce? A volunteer to draft something? KD: "Test Leader" -- trying to define a profile, would help the chair to select such a person. DM: Good idea. Put up a template or maximal list that a WG should consider. LH: explains his email [?], how does this person/job relate to the stuff outlined in the QAH? Should QAH be changed so this becomes a technique of something in QAH? KD: something more practical. He'll try to harmonize his idea with LR [?] and LH emails. DM: is there a definition of "Spec Editor" anywhere? KD: not sure such exists. AI to Karl: find list of documents in W3C which refer to different roles in QA. Chair, team contact, spec editor, test manager. Due 1 week. >6.) Adjourn > Overflow (12-12:30): available. Meeting adjourned at 11:45 EST. >[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-qaframe-spec-20041122/ >[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2004Nov/0009
Received on Tuesday, 14 December 2004 00:50:38 UTC