- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 16:15:23 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG -- At today's telecon, we decided to move further discussion of this to email. We were working on the first Good Practice of "Acquire", http://www.w3.org/QA/WG/2004/04/QA-handbook#Acquire We decided that details were to be in TestGL turf. I cut this text out, >[Issue: Is there possibility here for a "TM Quality Assessment >Checklist/Template", such as: "correctness, traceability, atomicity, user >documentation, maintainer documentation, declaration of scope, >completeness (vis a' vis declared scope), harnesses or interfaces for >application of the TM, reconfigurability, results assessment, results >recording & reporting, automation features, versioning/errata support, >declaration of publication licenses, integrated submission procedures, >etc." (Issue cont'd): or, would this trample too much on TestLite turf? >Further possible material is in old OpsET for CP5.5] I left in QAH a for-example list of the things that an assessment process might cover, and conclude with "QA Framework: Test Guidelines deals with this topic in much more detail, including (planned) templates and assessment aids." So ... over to email discussion. (And AI to Patrick -- put a placeholder in TestGL draft so that this isn't forgotten.) -Lofton.
Received on Monday, 26 April 2004 18:15:40 UTC