Re: QA WG Response to SpecGL comments

Dear Dominique,

On behalf of the XML Schema WG I'd like to inform the QAWG that 
the XML Schema WG is happy and fully satisfied with the disposition 
and have only one comment on the issue LC-73.9: the definition of a term 
"assertion" seems still different in SpecGL and in the QA Glossary:

    SpecGL:      a statement of behavior, action, or condition that can be measured or tested 
                 (See also QA Glossary [QA-GLOSSARY].)

    QA Glossary: A set of premises that are known to be true by definition in the spec.

It would be good to bring the SpecGL definition in accordance with definition in the QA Glossary.

Thank you and the group for all your efforts and taking all of our comments into account

Leonid Arbouzov

> Subject: QA WG Response to SpecGL comments
> Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:00:47 -0400 (EDT)
> From: (Dominique HazaŽl-Massieux)
> To: Leonid.Arbouzov@Sun.COM,
> Dear Leonid,
> Thank you for your comments on Last Call WD of "QA Framework:  Specification Guidelines" (SpecGL).  This is QAWG's response.
> Your reply -- whether you accept or reject QAWG's disposition of your comments -- is requested by September 26, 2003.  If you do not reply by then, your default response is recorded as "Accept". If you need an extended deadline to send your comments, please let us know as soon as possible so that we can negotiate a new date.
> You will find QAWG's response to your comments in the "Disposition of Comments" (DoC) document [1].  Please note that [1] is for Specification Guidelines only. Operational Guidelines and Introduction specifications are being handled separately.
> In the descriptive information before the table in [1], you will find a complete description of the contents of the DoC table.
> If you do not accept QAWG's disposition of your comments, please provide details, including:   your reasons; and, what changes to the dispositions would be required to satisfy you.
> Please copy the QAWG list on your reply ( -- the Cc: of this message).
> Regards,
> For Lofton Henderson (QAWG co-chair, for the QAWG),
> Dominique Hazael-Massieux, SpecGL Lead Editor
> [1]
> More specifically, the responses to your comments start at:

Received on Friday, 26 September 2003 12:59:09 UTC