- From: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>
- Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 14:02:44 -0400
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20030905134823.022ca498@mailserver.nist.gov>
I've enclosed the test assertions I developed for all of SpecGL. I know a couple of checkpoints aren't stable, but I'll redo those when they change. While developing the assertions I noticed a few anomalies in SpecGL. I've told Lynne about them and she is going to change a few things in SpecGL to make the conformance requirements consistent with what was intended. One open question still remains. Ckpoint 10.1 asks for test assertions to be provided, but says nothing else about them. In my test assertion for SpecGL I asked for the test assertions to cover all the requirements in the specification. Lynne seems to think that SpecGL may have purposely avoided doing that but couldn't remember why. It seems to me that without this additional constraint one could meet this checkpoint by providing exactly 2 (and no more) test assertions. I'd like to see this checkpoint tied to the requirements in the spec. Mark
**************************************************************** Mark Skall Chief, Software Diagnostics and Conformance Testing Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) 100 Bureau Drive, Stop 8970 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8970 Voice: 301-975-3262 Fax: 301-590-9174 Email: skall@nist.gov ****************************************************************
Attachments
- text/html attachment: Assertions.html
Received on Friday, 5 September 2003 14:03:25 UTC