- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2003 17:07:39 -0600
- To: Mark Skall <mark.skall@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 01:57 PM 10/15/03 -0400, Mark Skall wrote: >[...] >The first issue is LC-33. >DH - Ian Jacobs claiming checkpoint 1.4 is still too vague. We didn't >implement the resolution that we are making a change. We will look at the >resolution and make change. Correction: this is LC-23. (Ian had no further feedback on LC-33, and indeed LC-23 is the one where we resolved to make changes but didn't actually do make them.) -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 15 October 2003 19:07:28 UTC