- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 May 2003 08:47:03 -0600
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
QAWG If you want to make technical comments on this, please do so on IG list (e.g., in reply to [1]). [1]: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2003Apr/0060.html Monday is an telecon OpsGL day. Now that commitment-group is out of the way, our next (maybe only) major one is the re-org proposal in LC-60.1, which says in essence: we have about the right collection of CPs, but a strong chronological organization would benefit OpsGL. And LC-57 requests a picture (or table or whatever) to clarify chronology. The proposal at [1] is basically: clarify as much as possible (improving the 60.x), but avoid any major re-org that doesn't fix something really broken (because it will surely send us into another publication cycle, which will mean at least 4 months extra time added to OpsGL.) Silence = agreement. If you want to talk about it Monday, then please send some discussion (on IG). -Lofton.
Received on Wednesday, 7 May 2003 10:53:11 UTC