- From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Date: Mon, 03 Mar 2003 12:09:21 -0700
- To: David Marston/Cambridge/IBM <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
At 06:05 PM 3/2/2003 -0500, you wrote: > >Comments on the TestGL, Dec 2002 version > >When will this discussion migrate to the www-qa list? Good question. We keep doing the see-saw on the WG-IG venue for comments. This is a comment/issue that I have included with others (stay tuned for future message) for the QAWGPD (process doc) discussion. It wouldn't hurt to try to write down guidelines -- I myself have to rethink this every time, and in fact sent my contribution to the WG list without thinking. I would suggest that the comments of Lynne and me be sent to the IG list. We did invite the IG list to submit TestGL comments by 2/28 (Friday). What do you (all) think? -Lofton. > >16. CP 4.5 Ensure the ease of use for the test automation > >This is a judgment as to 'ease of use'. It is important to understand > >who the audience is for using the test automation and build and > >document the automation accordingly. What is important is to document > >how it can be used. Also recognize that if people can+IBk-t figure out how > >to run the tests, they won+IBk-t use them. > >I think rather the vague "ease of use", the real focus should be on >correct execution of the tests for repeatable results. If several >test labs obtain the test cases and software, they should all get the >same results when testing the same products. >.................David Marston
Received on Monday, 3 March 2003 14:15:22 UTC