- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2003 07:33:49 -0400
- To: Olivier Thereaux <ot@w3.org>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Olivier That is probably a good idea - to change the coverage time so that we could publish earlier. I will try, although depending on how busy things get, it may slip. Lynne At 09:54 PM 6/23/2003, Olivier Thereaux wrote: >Lynne, >[copying the WG for input] > > >The Month in QA for may is published now, and the announcement and news >items will follow. Thanks for your very valuable work. > >I feel bad about publishing the may summary at the very end of >june. I certainly don't blame you for that, since this time and the >previous ones, it was because of me that the summary was posted late. > >If we included the last few days of the previous month in a month's >summary, it means that your draft could be ready at the beginning of the >month (and that would be a good incentive for me to publish it very >fast). It doesn't change much, but it "sounds" better to publish the >summary for june on july 1st, even though it's really the summary for 25 >may - 25 june. > >Thoughts? > >[oh, and BTW I will be off work at the beginning of july, someone else >should publish next MinQA] > >-- >olivier
Received on Tuesday, 24 June 2003 07:34:00 UTC