- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 10:35:53 +0300
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
For your comments /Dimitris --- Minutes day 2 (17/6/2003) PM Scribe: Dimitris Dimitriadis Action Items: AI-20030617-xx MS to develop test assertions for Test GL, by September 1 AI-20030617-xx LH to ask Ian Jacobs for clarification regarding LC29.4 by email, due 20030620 AI-20030617-xx DH to ask Ian Jacobs why he doesn't want to use RFC keywords and in case there are good reasons go for the mapping, due 20030624 Minutes Spec GL Last Call issues for test assertions issue 13 AI to develop test assertions fo Test GL, completed by September 1 (Mark) [closed] issue 14: dm: providing means to have a link from the specification to a separate document lr: need to include in the explanation of the checkpoint that they can be provided either in the document or by reference. Clarify this in the terminology. Editors will add something to this effect. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa/2003Jun/0022.html (Test assertions and conformance requirements) point 3: pc: identifying and labelling is necessary lh: 6 terms in use, the only one defined is "test assertion" lr: someone needs to draft the definition of "conformance requirement" necessary or recommended optional conditions for conformance to the specification AI to ask Ian for clarification regarding LC29.4, will send email (Lofton), due 20030620 Issue 65 (done) Issue 67 lh: conformance requirements do not have to use 2119 keywords. testable statements is undefined. dm: if there are good reasons, provide mapping between RFC keywords and the conformance requirements AI: ask Ian who he doesn't want to use RFC keywords and in case there are good reasons go for the mapping (DM), 20030624 issue 73.9 top definition goes into the main glossary We'll make our definitions consistent. issue 75.9 (closed) issue 106 (resolved) issues 102, 104, 105 Reordering: merge GL3 and GL10 move current 10.2 into GL13 move ckpoint 11.1 into GL10 merge GL11 and GL12 resolution: reorder the guidelines with the current numbers to be GL13, GL10+GL3, GL11+GL12 levels of conformance: agreement to add wording explaining that prioritites 1-3 are included to progressively go from good to better to best as far as qualitative assessment is concerned GL 2.3: now conforms since we added a new specification category GL 2.4: we agree there is only one class GL 3.3: we have two DOV, we agreed to do an editorial change to conform to GL3.3 GL 8.1: priority 2 or 3 is by definition discretionary (prio 2 only discretionary items in relation to level A conformance) lr: all things in GL4 are discretionary we need redefine by "indicating the rational for discretonary items" AI rewrite 8.1 (mark), 20030630 meeting adjourned 17.45
Received on Wednesday, 18 June 2003 03:36:12 UTC