- From: <david_marston@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2003 21:38:53 -0400
- To: www-qa-wg@w3.org
Lynne proposed for CP3.1: >Rationale: the reader must be able to recognize any minimum >functionality, complexity or support that applies to conforming >products of a specific class. It helps the reader find these >requirements by presenting them as a collection, in one place rather >than distributed throughout the document. My spin on this: The minimum requirements can be considered the seed of a checklist to be used by a team developing a conforming product. How about putting this sentence between the other two? .................David Marston
Received on Saturday, 7 June 2003 21:39:12 UTC