- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: 29 Jul 2003 10:59:22 +0200
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 04:59:25 UTC
Le lun 28/07/2003 à 19:26, Lofton Henderson a écrit : > At 06:23 PM 6/20/03 +0200, Dominique Hazaël-Massieux wrote: > >[...] > > > · a Working Group has committed in its charter to a level AA > > > conformance to the Specification Guidelines for its specifications (as > > > required for AA conformance to the Operational Guidelines, for instance) ; > > The "(as required...)" is inaccurate. OpsGL AA conformance doesn't require > SpecGL AA conformance. Rather, OpsGL CP1.1 (as revised) requires that the > WG make a SpecGL conformance commitment (of A, or AA, or AAA). This is a > priority 1 CP. Therefore it relates to OpsGL A conformance. > > This would be accurate: > > "* a Working Group has committed in its charter to conform to the > Specification Guidelines for its specifications (as required for A > conformance to the Operational Guidelines, for instance), and has picked > the level AA conformance level." Good catch, I have fixed the use case in the editor's version of SpecGL. Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2003 04:59:25 UTC