W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-qa-wg@w3.org > January 2003

Re: AI-20021010-02 done - Comm Team

From: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2003 20:18:21 -0700
Message-Id: <>
To: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org

At 02:56 AM 1/14/2003 +0100, Dimitris Dimitriadis wrote:

>I could incorporate the changes as soon as the minutes from the F2F get
>available, since I don't remember everything we agreed on.

You can find all of the draft minutes on the WG archive now:



>On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 01:18  AM, Lofton Henderson wrote:
>>At 03:12 PM 1/13/03 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote:
>>>Action Item:
>>>asks to Janet if it (CFP for test task force)
>>>possible and how to do it and write a Call For
>>>Participation (include Dimitris in the loop)
>>>Status: done
>>>After discussion with Janet, there's no process at W3C to create a
>>>call for participation for creating a Test Task Force. The rationale
>>>is that a Task Force is created inside an already existing WG and
>>>defines just an internal process of the WG to deal with a specific
>>>Said that, Janet, as Head of Comm Team, noticed we have done a huge
>>>work inside the QA WG with regards to the resources we have and
>>>acknowledged that it would be more beneficial for us to get more
>>>members participating to the QA WG. To help in this business, she has
>>>proposed to give more publicity to the QA WG in the next Member
>>>newsletter, presenting what we have done and the things we need to
>>>I will work with Susan Lesch on this item for the newsletter.
>>I would be happy to help, as a reviewer or whatever.
>>>There is also a possibility to advertise a bit the AC Members
>>>directly on their mailing list, but only Janet can do that.
>>>The charter for this news TTF has been drafted and is available at
>>I would suggest that we not point to this document (a 1st rough
>>draft).  We agreed to changes at Seattle that will improve the focus,
>>specificity, and tone.  Dimitris is going to incorporate the changes
>>The item is not yet in the AI list, but see 8-jan PM draft minutes
>>[1].  The apparent due date is 29 January.
>>Dimitris, would you be able to have the new draft earlier, if the
>>topic were to be referenced in the Member newsletter?
>>[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jan/0026.html
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 22:22:50 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:43:32 UTC