- From: Dimitris Dimitriadis <dimitris@ontologicon.com>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 02:56:01 +0100
- To: Lofton Henderson <lofton@rockynet.com>
- Cc: Karl Dubost <karl@w3.org>, Janet Daly <janet@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org
I could incorporate the changes as soon as the minutes from the F2F get available, since I don't remember everything we agreed on. /Dimitris On Tuesday, January 14, 2003, at 01:18 AM, Lofton Henderson wrote: > > At 03:12 PM 1/13/03 -0500, Karl Dubost wrote: > >> Action Item: >> >> asks to Janet if it (CFP for test task force) >> possible and how to do it and write a Call For >> Participation (include Dimitris in the loop) >> >> Status: done >> >> After discussion with Janet, there's no process at W3C to create a >> call for participation for creating a Test Task Force. The rationale >> is that a Task Force is created inside an already existing WG and >> defines just an internal process of the WG to deal with a specific >> action. >> >> Said that, Janet, as Head of Comm Team, noticed we have done a huge >> work inside the QA WG with regards to the resources we have and >> acknowledged that it would be more beneficial for us to get more >> members participating to the QA WG. To help in this business, she has >> proposed to give more publicity to the QA WG in the next Member >> newsletter, presenting what we have done and the things we need to >> continue. >> >> I will work with Susan Lesch on this item for the newsletter. > > I would be happy to help, as a reviewer or whatever. > > >> There is also a possibility to advertise a bit the AC Members >> directly on their mailing list, but only Janet can do that. >> >> The charter for this news TTF has been drafted and is available at >> <URL:http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jan/att-0007/ >> 01-QAWGTTF.html> > > I would suggest that we not point to this document (a 1st rough > draft). We agreed to changes at Seattle that will improve the focus, > specificity, and tone. Dimitris is going to incorporate the changes > The item is not yet in the AI list, but see 8-jan PM draft minutes > [1]. The apparent due date is 29 January. > > Dimitris, would you be able to have the new draft earlier, if the > topic were to be referenced in the Member newsletter? > > Cheers, > -Lofton. > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-qa-wg/2003Jan/0026.html >
Received on Monday, 13 January 2003 20:55:29 UTC