- From: Dominique Hazaël-Massieux <dom@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 14:17:00 +0100
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-qa-wg@w3.org, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 08:17:02 UTC
Le mer 17/12/2003 à 09:08, Jeremy Carroll a écrit : > Looking at the QA matrix > http://www.w3.org/QA/TheMatrix.html > > I note the following aspects concerning the RDF PR documents > 1) RDF Schema does not have conformance clauses The QA Matrix doesn't claim that it does. Or did I misunderstand what you meant? > 2) The test suite covers aspects of RDF Syntax, RDF Semantics, RDF Schema and > RDF Concepts (although it is not a conformance test suite for any of these) OK, I've added Test Suites entries for these various specs. > 3) there is an RDF validator hosted at www.w3.org/RDF/Validator that checks > syntax against RDF Syntax, and also some constraints from the abstract > syntax, in RDF Concepts The RDF Validator is now bound to both of these specs. > PS for OWL there is more than one validator, none of which are hosted at the > W3C - typically they validate the syntax only Could you send us the URLs of these services, so that we can link to them from the matrix? Thanks for the updates, Dom -- Dominique Hazaël-Massieux - http://www.w3.org/People/Dom/ W3C/ERCIM mailto:dom@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 17 December 2003 08:17:02 UTC