- From: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 13:57:29 -0400
- To: Luu Tran <Luu.Tran@Sun.COM>
- Cc: boyera stephane <boyera@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org, "'W3C DIWG'" <w3c-di-wg@w3.org>
Looks good. Thanks Lynne At 12:58 PM 8/5/2003, Luu Tran wrote: >Hi Lynne, > >Thanks for your comments [1]. We've given this some further thought, and >we propose to change the wording in [2] as follows: > >1. Conformant: a CC/PP consumer can claim to be a 'CC/PP 1.0 conformant >consumer' if it accepts any valid CC/PP profile and extracts information >from it. > >2. Validating: a CC/PP consumer can claim to be a 'CC/PP 1.0 conformant >validating consumer' if it is conformant and if it rejects all invalid >CC/PP profiles. > >Does that look ok? > >Thanks, >Luu > >[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-di-wg/2003Jul/0186.html >[2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/#ConformanceConsumer > >
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2003 13:57:45 UTC