- From: Luu Tran <Luu.Tran@Sun.COM>
- Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 09:58:23 -0700
- To: Lynne Rosenthal <lynne.rosenthal@nist.gov>
- Cc: boyera stephane <boyera@w3.org>, www-qa-wg@w3.org, "'W3C DIWG'" <w3c-di-wg@w3.org>
Hi Lynne, Thanks for your comments [1]. We've given this some further thought, and we propose to change the wording in [2] as follows: 1. Conformant: a CC/PP consumer can claim to be a 'CC/PP 1.0 conformant consumer' if it accepts any valid CC/PP profile and extracts information from it. 2. Validating: a CC/PP consumer can claim to be a 'CC/PP 1.0 conformant validating consumer' if it is conformant and if it rejects all invalid CC/PP profiles. Does that look ok? Thanks, Luu [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-di-wg/2003Jul/0186.html [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/CCPP-struct-vocab/#ConformanceConsumer
Received on Tuesday, 5 August 2003 12:58:29 UTC